4ever-blowin-bubbles 6:26 Thu Sep 28
Ben Stokes - Charged with Affray
|
ben stokes is in trouble after a fight 2 30 am in the morning and been arrested should he stay or go for the ashes series ?
|
|
Replies - Newest Posts First ( Show In Chronological Order)
Sven Roeder
3:29 Wed Aug 15
Re: Ben Stokes - Charged with Affray
|
Ben Stooookeees ... he’s one of their owwwwn 🎼🎼🎼
|
White Pony
12:42 Wed Aug 15
Re: Ben Stokes - Charged with being an idiot
|
Harsh on Buttler but I'd maybe leave him out for now. He's in for his batting and not scoring. Stokes gives us another option with the ball.
|
Northern Sold
12:37 Wed Aug 15
Re: Ben Stokes - Charged with being an idiot
|
Super Ginge....
BEN STOKESSSSS... PROTECTOR OF GAYSSSSSS...
|
Eerie Descent
9:45 Wed Aug 15
Re: Ben Stokes - Charged with being an idiot
|
Drop Buttler and play all 3 of them, or drop Broad.
|
Sven Roeder
8:56 Wed Aug 15
Re: Ben Stokes - Charged with being an idiot
|
Back in the squad but his punchy antics have allowed Sam Curran and Chris Woakes to impress in his place. Not sure you could argue that either of them deserves to be left out for him … Curran MOTM in Test 1 & Woakes at Lords.
|
normannomates
3:14 Wed Aug 15
Re: Ben Stokes - Charged with Affray
|
chigwell 10.58
|
Marston Hammer
11:14 Tue Aug 14
Re: Ben Stokes - Charged with Affray
|
https://mobile.twitter.com/BarristerSecret/status/1029436855073296384/photo/1
Based on the questions the juries had to ask themselves in order to make their decision no real surprise they found him not guilty.
|
Chigwell
10:58 Tue Aug 14
Re: Ben Stokes - Charged with Affray
|
Common sense says that he went beyond defending himself (or someone else) and that he was probably guilty. Whether it was assault or affray is a mere technicality: for affray you don't have to prove lack of consent, so is the obvious charge when the alleged victim is not giving prosecution evidence. On every post I have made since last year I have said that Stokes would be acquitted, because juries are overly impressed by a defendant who has made something of his life, and are unwilling to disrupt that with a conviction. Multiply that by 10 in the case of a national sporting hero.
|
wanstead_hammer
10:31 Tue Aug 14
Re: Ben Stokes - Charged with Affray
|
So he's definitely OUT. OWZAT?
|
geoffpikey
10:26 Tue Aug 14
Re: Ben Stokes - Charged with Affray
|
I've suffered worse punishment after Affray Bentos pie.
Here all week.
|
normannomates
9:59 Tue Aug 14
Re: Ben Stokes - Charged with Affray
|
although if you get a good brief..they can pick the law apart
|
normannomates
9:54 Tue Aug 14
Re: Ben Stokes - Charged with Affray
|
W4 hammer 5.11
well i am pleased someone has worked it out.
different rules for football lads mate..has been since 1988.
a few yrs football banning order each and likely custodial and criminal record for these two if they were football lads..
known plent WH and others that have been put behind the door for less than this
|
paulon
7:09 Tue Aug 14
Re: Ben Stokes - Charged with Affray
|
Affray is basically one step up from a parking ticket these days
|
Russ of the BML
6:20 Tue Aug 14
Re: Ben Stokes - Charged with Affray
|
Bloke pissed up and acted like a cunt. Deserved more from what I could see.
|
Lee Trundle
5:54 Tue Aug 14
Re: Ben Stokes - Charged with Affray
|
He's now been called up to the squad for the third test.
*starts stopwatch again*
|
w4hammer
5:11 Tue Aug 14
Re: Ben Stokes - Charged with Affray
|
how the fuck are they not being charged with violent disorder- which is the catch all for football lads caught in any ruck like this?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Violent_disorder
|
w4hammer
5:11 Tue Aug 14
Re: Ben Stokes - Charged with Affray
|
how the fuck are they not being charged with violent disorder- which is the catch all for football lads caught in any ruck like this?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Violent_disorder
|
Fortunes Hiding
4:29 Tue Aug 14
Re: Ben Stokes - Charged with Affray
|
If anyone bothers to read the verdict on BBC, Stokes was charged with affray not assault.
If you can get your head round that, then the decision makes sense.
I've backed India to lose 5-0, so this might help.
|
Lee Trundle
3:55 Tue Aug 14
Re: Ben Stokes - Charged with Affray
|
*stops stopwatch*
Been out for lunch?
|
Sven Roeder
3:52 Tue Aug 14
Re: Ben Stokes - Charged with Affray
|
Presumably not available while the ECB decide whether to charge him. Should be able to decide that by the end of the year and set a hearing for around June 2019. Definitely will be able announce that verdict around the end of September 2019.
At least we now have a definition of affray. Or at least what it’s not. Pursuing a bloke down the street as he backs off and punching him to the ground ISNT affray. Should keep all these minor street brawl cases out of the courts then.
|
Sven Roeder
3:52 Tue Aug 14
Re: Ben Stokes - Charged with Affray
|
Presumably not available while the ECB decide whether to charge him. Should be able to decide that by the end of the year and set a hearing for around June 2019. Definitely will be able announce that verdict around the end of September 2019.
At least we now have a definition of affray. Or at least what it’s not. Pursuing a bloke down the street as he backs off and punching him to the ground ISNT affray. Should keep all these minor street brawl cases out of the courts then.
|
|